browser icon
You are using an insecure version of your web browser. Please update your browser!
Using an outdated browser makes your computer unsafe. For a safer, faster, more enjoyable user experience, please update your browser today or try a newer browser.

Lactose Intolerant Doesn’t Mean Stupid

Posted by on August 4, 2006

I was rather surprised by the following news bite from the Washington Post:

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit that called for milk sold in the District to carry a warning label for people who are lactose intolerant.

The suit, filed by an organization that promotes vegetarian diets, asserted that Giant, Safeway and other local distributors of dairy products had been negligent in not warning consumers of the potential effects of dairy products on people who are lactose intolerant.

The suit was filed in D.C. Superior Court last fall by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine and was subsequently transferred to U.S. District Court.

U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy Jr. ruled that federal law on food labeling would preclude the action that the plaintiffs were seeking in the District.

Wait a minute. They failed to label milk so the lactose-intolerant could avoid it? Milk? Um, it’s milk. Even if someone with a sensitivity has no idea what lactose is or what other products it might be in, they know it’s in milk. Am I missing something here? Why should there be a warning on milk? The name of the group is misleading too, because PCRM sure seems to focus a lot on food and animal testing ethics – it’s like a kinder, gentler PETA that’s pretending to be a medical organization. I’m sure they have doctors on staff, and I’m sure their tactics are much more sane than PETA’s methods, but…they’re not really focusing on what they purport to be about. But anyway…milk? We have to tell the lactose-intolerant to avoid milk?

2 Responses to Lactose Intolerant Doesn’t Mean Stupid

  1. Jessi

    *bangs head repeatedly on desk*

    Nope, not enough

    *bangs head even more*

  2. Levi

    Actually, PCRM is notorious for starting frivolous lawsuits and doing publicity stunts similar to PETA just to get attention. They do have have some doctors on staff, but the vast majority of their members aren’t docs. They are also very much connected to PETA, having received funds from them as well as the fact that some of their bigwigs are also members of and possibly under the employ of PETA, or at least in advisory roles. I’ve written about them a few times:

    http://twelveblackcodemonkeys.com/pcrm_goes_from_dirty_tricks_to_potential_crime_in_trying_to_paint_atkins_diet_as_unhealthy.htm

    http://twelveblackcodemonkeys.com/pcrm_you_outdo_yourselves.htm

    http://twelveblackcodemonkeys.com/response_from_atkins_on_pcrm_litigation.htm

    http://twelveblackcodemonkeys.com/dieter_sues_atkins_estate_and_company.htm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>